Model Hub

🚀 LLaVA-One-Vision-1.5-Mid-Training-85M Dataset is being uploaded 🚀 Upload Status All Completed: ImageNet-21k、LAIONCN、DataComp-1B、Zero250M、COYO700M、SA-1B、MINT、Obelics 📜 Cite If you find LLaVA-One-Vision-1.5-Mid-Training-85M useful in your research, please consider to cite the following related papers: @misc{an2025llavaonevision15fullyopenframework, title={LLaVA-OneVision-1.5: Fully Open Framework for Democratized Multimodal Training}… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/mvp-lab/LLaVA-OneVision-1.5-Mid-Training-85M.

Objaverse Objaverse is a Massive Dataset with 800K+ Annotated 3D Objects. More documentation is coming soon. In the meantime, please see our paper and website for additional details. License The use of the dataset as a whole is licensed under the ODC-By v1.0 license. Individual objects in Objaverse are all licensed as creative commons distributable objects, and may be under the following licenses: CC-BY 4.0 - 721K objects CC-BY-NC 4.0 - 25K objects CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 - 52K… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/allenai/objaverse.

Dataset Card for "super_glue" Dataset Summary SuperGLUE (https://super.gluebenchmark.com/) is a new benchmark styled after GLUE with a new set of more difficult language understanding tasks, improved resources, and a new public leaderboard. Supported Tasks and Leaderboards More Information Needed Languages More Information Needed Dataset Structure Data Instances axb Size of downloaded dataset files: 0.03 MB Size of… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/aps/super_glue.

The ability to solve problems is a hallmark of intelligence and has been an enduring goal in AI. AI systems that can create programs as solutions to problems or assist developers in writing programs can increase productivity and make programming more accessible. Recently, pre-trained large language models have shown impressive abilities in generating new codes from natural language descriptions, repairing buggy codes, translating codes between languages, and retrieving relevant code segments. However, the evaluation of these models has often been performed in a scattered way on only one or two specific tasks, in a few languages, at a partial granularity (e.g., function) level and in many cases without proper training data. Even more concerning is that in most cases the evaluation of generated codes has been done in terms of mere lexical overlap rather than actual execution whereas semantic similarity (or equivalence) of two code segments depends only on their ``execution similarity'', i.e., being able to get the same output for a given input.